Non-Compete Agreements Strategic Counsel for Shareholder Battles

Non-Compete Agreement Lawyers in Houston

Name: Hopkins Centrich Law
Address: 8701 New Trails, Suite 200, The Woodlands, TX, 77381
Telephone: (254) 249-5436

Business-Minded Strategy for High-Stakes Non-Compete Conflicts

A proposed restriction can shape where an executive works, whether an owner launches a new venture, and how a company protects its customer relationships. A non-compete agreement typically restricts competitive activity after an employment, ownership, or business relationship ends through limits on time, territory, and the work a person may perform.

The practical analysis depends on the contract language, the agreement supporting the restriction, the business interest at stake, and the conduct in question. Legal review may be warranted before signing, after receiving a demand letter, or when a former employee, executive, or business partner appears to be violating an existing covenant.

Call (254) 249-5436 to discuss a proposed non-compete, threatened enforcement, or alleged violation in Houston.

Restrictive Covenants Tied to Ownership & Company Control

At Hopkins Centrich Law, we focus on shareholder oppression and complex business disputes involving closely held companies. That perspective matters when a restrictive covenant intersects with company control, confidential information, business goodwill, or an owner’s continuing obligations.

These conflicts require more than reading one clause in isolation. We examine the agreements, business interests, and relationships surrounding the restriction, applying practical judgment and strategic planning to disputes that may require trial-ready preparation.

Texas Non-Compete Enforceability Under Chapter 15

Texas Business and Commerce Code Sections 15.50 through 15.52 govern many questions about non-compete enforceability. Section 15.50 generally requires a covenant to be ancillary to, or part of, an otherwise enforceable agreement. Its limits on time, geographic area, and scope of activity also can’t impose a greater restraint than necessary to protect goodwill or another business interest.

An enforceability analysis commonly examines:

Supporting agreement: Whether an enforceable employment agreement, business sale agreement, ownership agreement, or other relationship supports the covenant.
Consideration: What promises, information, benefits, or obligations were exchanged in connection with the restriction.
Protected interest: Whether the covenant addresses business goodwill, confidential information, trade secrets, or significant customer relationships.
Reasonable limits: Whether the duration, geographic area, and restricted activities are no broader than necessary.

A signed restriction isn’t automatically enforceable as written. Depending on the language and surrounding facts, a Texas court may reform an otherwise enforceable covenant that is broader than the law permits. The Federal Trade Commission’s nationwide non-compete rule isn’t in effect, so each agreement still requires analysis under applicable state law.

Non-Solicitation, Confidentiality, & Trade-Secret Protections

Restrictive covenants protect different interests and impose different obligations. A non-solicitation agreement generally limits efforts to pursue specified customers, clients, employees, or other relationships. A non-compete more broadly restricts competitive work or business activity.

Confidentiality provisions address the disclosure or misuse of protected information, while trade-secret protections concern information that derives value from remaining secret and is subject to reasonable secrecy measures. The appropriate provision depends on the parties’ relationship, the information or goodwill involved, and the conduct the contract is intended to address.

Continue Reading Read Less

Five-Star Client Reviews

Protecting Your Investment

Get Sophisticated Strategy On Your Side

Very Happy With the Outcome
“Professional, knowledgeable, and easy to work with. Communication was clear and consistent, and they made me feel supported at every step.”

- Michael D.
Wonderful to Work With
“Wonderful company to work with as this was our experience with their representation. They were able to get everything resolved in a timely manner.”

- Former Client
Exceptional Attorney
“Kirby Hopkins is an exceptional attorney who resolved my case quickly and efficiently. The communication and updates from the firm kept me informed as my case progressed.”

- Charlotte N.
We're Extremely Happy
“They helped us tremendously in a couple of issues. They have really been attentive with us and supportive. We are extremely happy with their work and the results.”

- Ale P.
Attentive & Understanding
“Hopkins Centrich provided prompt, tailored advice and insightfully explained convoluted terminology in clear terms that safeguarded my interests amid intricate business disputes.”

- Sheila N.
Attention to Detail
“The attorneys at Hopkins Centrich provided dedicated guidance and meticulous attention to detail. They incorporated clauses aligned to my specific business needs.”

- Valentino M.
Thinking Steps Ahead
“Joe's personable approach made us confident in his abilities. His intelligence is evident in the way he handles complex legal issues, always thinking steps ahead.”

- Former Client
Honest & Ethical
“I have known Kirby Hopkins for 30+ years and I trust him with my life. He is honest, ethical, and always a trusted advisor to ensure his clients are well represented!”

- Anu P.
They Got Us Justice
“Stephen and his team got us the justice we deserved, and we couldn't be happier. We really appreciate all their hard work, and could not have done it without them!”

- Logan B.

View All Reviews

What Sets Us Apart

Your Stake is Worth Fighting For

When the Gloves Come Off, We're Ready

Focused Firepower

Our focus on shareholder disputes means sharper strategy, stronger leverage, and smarter outcomes for minority owners.
Business-First Strategy

We understand how companies actually run, meaning our advice is grounded in real-world business judgment.
Big-Firm Talent, Boutique Precision

You'll get sophisticated litigation experience with lean, efficient execution and a personalized experience.
Trial-Ready Leverage

We prepare every case as if it’s going to court. That preparation strengthens negotiation power and drives serious settlement value.

Key Decisions in Drafting, Reviewing, or Enforcing a Covenant

A covenant should be evaluated within the broader business relationship before it is prepared, revised, negotiated, or enforced. The analysis should identify who is covered, which activities are restricted, how long the limits last, what territory applies, and which business interest supports them.

Documents and facts that may matter include:

The non-compete and related employment, ownership, compensation, or business sale agreements.
Communications about the restriction, confidential information, customers, employees, or planned competitive activity.
Evidence of the person’s role, territory, customer contacts, access to information, and conduct after the relationship ended.
Records of customer solicitation, employee recruitment, competing work, or alleged use of trade secrets.

An enforcement dispute may involve a breach-of-contract claim, trade-secret allegations, damages, or injunctive relief. Potential defenses may include overbreadth, the absence of an enforceable supporting agreement, or conduct that falls outside the covenant’s scope.

Common Non-Compete Disputes in Closely Held Companies

Conflicts can arise from employment changes, ownership separations, and business transactions. The person’s prior role, access to information, customer relationships, territory, timing, and related contracts can materially affect the analysis.

Common scenarios include:

Joining a competitor: A former employee or executive accepts a role that the prior company contends falls within restricted activity.
Starting a business: An owner, executive, or former worker launches a competing venture and disputes whether the covenant applies.
Soliciting relationships: A company alleges that customers, clients, or employees were approached in violation of a non-solicitation provision.
Using protected information: The parties dispute the alleged use or disclosure of confidential information or trade secrets.
Challenging a restriction: An individual seeks review before accepting work, contacting customers, or investing in a competing company.
Completing a business sale: A buyer or seller disputes post-sale restrictions tied to transferred goodwill and negotiated obligations.

Business sale and ownership-related covenants may require a different analysis from ordinary employment restrictions. The transaction, transferred goodwill, bargaining context, and continuing obligations can change both the legal questions and the parties’ commercial leverage.

When a Non-Compete Dispute Needs Prompt Review

Time can shape the available strategy when competitive activity has begun, a start date is approaching, or a demand sets a response deadline. Early review can clarify whether the agreement applies, which evidence should be preserved, and whether negotiation or urgent court action may be appropriate.

Neither side should assume that a signature resolves every issue or that an accusation establishes a violation. The covenant’s wording, the parties’ complete contractual relationship, and the conduct at issue all require close examination.

Clarify the Restriction Before Taking the Next Step

Hopkins Centrich Law brings clarity, precision, and strategic advocacy to complex business disputes. We consider the legal position alongside the commercial relationships, leverage, ownership rights, and company value at stake.

Gather the agreement, related contracts, relevant communications, and a concise timeline. These materials can help identify whether the dispute concerns review, negotiation, enforcement, defense, or a related ownership conflict.

Call (254) 249-5436 to discuss your non-compete agreement or restrictive-covenant dispute with Hopkins Centrich Law.

Continue Reading Read Less

Hopkins Centrich Law

Strategic Counsel for Shareholder Battles

Schedule A Consultation Today

Have questions? Ready to get started? Call (254) 249-5436 today or contact us online to schedule a consultation.

Step 1 of 3

First Name*
Please enter your first name.
Last Name*
Please enter your last name.
Phone*
Please enter your phone number.

This isn't a valid phone number.
Email*
Please enter your email address.

This isn't a valid email address.
Address*
Please enter your address.
City*
Please enter your city.
State*
Please make a selection.
Zip Code*
Please enter your Zip.
Will we be representing an individual or a company?*
Please make a selection.
Please enter the Company name below

Step 2 of 3

Legal Matter The information provided in this section will assist Hopkins Centrich, PLLC in understanding the nature of your matter, and to determine if the matter is within the scope of our practice and expertise.
Please select the legal category that applies.*
- Business Dispute
- Business Formation & Governance
- Shareholder Dispute
- Contract Drafting & Review
- Civil Litigation
- Estate Planning
- Trust Administration/Probate
- General Counsel
- Other
Please make a selection.
If "Other" was selected, please specify.
Please enter a message.
Briefly describe the nature of the matter in which you are seeking help.*
Please enter a message.
Have you retained prior attorney(s) in this matter?
If so, please provide the former attorney(s) and/or firm.
Are there any imminent deadlines or time limitations?*
Please enter a message.
If it were up to you, what would be the ideal outcome of this matter?*
Please enter a message.

Step 3 of 3

Cost Disclosure The objective of this section is to provide you with sufficient information regarding potential legal costs so that you can make informed choices about your legal options. Although costs will vary on a case by case basis, a retainer may be required. Cost estimates are largely determined by the time commitment that may be required for the case to reach conclusion.
Are you comfortable with and able to pay an initial retainer of $5,000?
Please make a selection.
How did you hear about Hopkins Centrich, PLLC?
Please make a selection.
If you selected "Referral", who referred you to us so we can thank them?
By submitting, you agree to receive text messages from Hopkins Centrich Law at the number provided, including those related to your inquiry, follow-ups, and review requests, via automated technology. Consent is not a condition of purchase. Msg & data rates may apply. Msg frequency may vary. Reply STOP to cancel or HELP for assistance. Acceptable Use Policy

Sign Up for Our Newsletters Your information will never be shared with anyone outside the law firm.

254-249-5436

Address

8701 New Trails
Suite 200
The Woodlands, TX 77381

Map & Directions [+]

Follow Us