Call for an appointment 888-481-9995

Wyoming Shareholder Law

Brief survey of Wyoming shareholder law.

Follow Us

Wyoming Shareholder Law Survey

Right to Inspect Books and Records

Wyoming shareholders have the right to inspect and corporate books and records, including: minutes of both shareholder and director meetings, accounting records, list of shareholders, by-laws, and articles of incorporation. Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 17-16-1601(e); 17-16-1602 (2010). The shareholder must make a written demand that gives the corporation at least five business days notice of the date on which the shareholder wishes to review the records. § 17-16-1602. The inspection must occur during regular business hours at the corporation’s principal office. § 17-16-1602.

To exercise this right, the shareholder must be a record owner of shares for at least six months and own at least 5% of all shares outstanding. § 17-16-1602(b).

The request to inspect must be made “in good faith and for a proper purpose.” § 17-16-1602(c)(i). The request must also “describe[] with reasonable particularity [the] purpose and the records” the shareholders wants to inspect. § 17-16-1602(c)(ii),(iii). The corporation may expand the right to inspect through its articles of incorporation or by-laws, but it may not limit this right. Wyoming Coal Mining Co. v. State, 1906, 15 Wyo. 97, 87 P. 337, reh’g denied 15 Wyo. 97, 87 P. 984.

Shareholder Oppression

Shareholders in a Wyoming close corporation may petition the district court relief if the directors are acting in a way that is “illegal, oppressive, fraudulent or unfairly prejudicial.” § 17-17-140.

A shareholder may also petition the district court for corporate dissolution if the shareholder can establish that the directors are acting in an “illegal, oppressive[,] or fraudulent” manner. § 17-16-1430 (ii).

In a closely-held corporation, officers/directors owe a fiduciary duty to one another. J Bar H, Inc. v. Johnson, 822 P.2d 849, 859 (Wyo. 1991). In that case, the corporation was not “technically a statutory close corporation” and the plaintiff was not a minority shareholder because she owned half the shares. Id. The court still applied the close corporation standard. Id.

Derivative Suits

To file a derivative suit, the shareholder must have been a shareholder at the time the act complained of occurred. The shareholder must also “fairly and adequately” represent the interests of the corporation. § 17-16-741.

Before filing a derivative suit, the shareholder must first make a written demand upon the corporation to take the desired action. § 17-16-742. The corporation then has 90 days to take the requested action or to reject the shareholder’s demand. § 17-16-742. However, the shareholder may file suit before the expiration of the 90-day period if “irreparable injury” would result should the shareholder be forced to wait the entire 90 days before filing suit. § 17-16-742.

A derivative suit cannot be dismissed or settled without prior court approval. § 17-16-745.

Share this content
    
Fryar Law Firm Knows Shareholder Oppression - Knowledge Makes The Difference

We are licensed only in Texas

In order to remain on the cutting edge of business owner rights law, Fryar Law Firm keeps abreast of legal developments in all 50 states. This 50-state survey is presented for educational purposes. However, we do not hold ourselves out as experts on the law of any jurisdiction other than Texas, and we may not practice law in any other state, with the following exceptions:

  • The lawsuit involves a non-Texas company but may be brought in Texas courts--example, if the client is a Texan or the company operates in Texas.

  • We are part of a legal team that includes local counsel. Out of state legal teams benefit from our experience when we consult. We may also act as lead counsel, if we have local co-counsel and permission of the court.

  • We are offering general consultation and are performing our work in Texas. We often consult with out-of-state clients on litigation strategy or assist them in organizing for litigation or settlement or in putting together a legal team. We also assist out-of-state clients in exercising their rights to corporate information.

This post represents our opinion regarding the relevant shareholder oppression and minority ownership rights law. However, not everyone agrees with us, and the law is changing quickly in this area. This page may not be up to date. Be sure to consult with qualified counsel before relying on any information of this page. See Terms and Conditions.

Fryar Law Firm Top 50 Verdicts in the Nation 2015Fryar Law Firm Largest 2015 Fraud Verdict in Texas